Forums
Forum Home > JFK > Sticky: --- === Prayer Man === --- | ||
---|---|---|
Moderator Posts: 402 |
Considering that this thread has incited full on bare knuckles throw downs on all forums concerned, I will just reiterate how profound it has become that all future discourse about the Kennedy case is now riding on the question of which gender is PM. Absurd on the face of it, but nonetheless solid proof of the powerful strength of the PM portfolio.
The thought that such future discourse is riding on the back of an old, swaybacked nag named “PM is a woman” is made even more absurd by the notion that up until she had a name, this was the same old horse wearing shoes manufactured by “The Single Bullet Theory”. Time to put this old hay burner out to pasture for good.
ROKC is ON.
| |
| ||
Administrator Posts: 729 | Hiding behind the skirt of an imaginary woman is the cowards way out. This isn't about gender its about not having any balls to take Sean's work on. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1403 |
Ok. PM is a woman. No stranger! It can't be a stranger because the witnesses say so. PM's a woman then. Now tell me like I'm a 2 year old who that TSBD female employee is. Like spell that out to me. | |
| ||
Member Posts: 158 |
Even if they are accidently right and PM is not Oswald, Sean Murphy et.al's outline of the probable series of events makes a thousand times more sense than the WC fairytale. If not PM, Oswald has to be close by, in the VESTIBULE or in the small storage room adjacent to the vestibule. The second floor lunch room stories are dead. All of them. | |
| ||
Member Posts: 60 |
When the topic of Prayer Man began to receive serious attention a few years back, I thought the figure might well be Oswald but that it would be almost impossible to prove. Thankfully, Sean Murphy succeeded and Barto has presented the ideal way of encapsulating the arguments involved. The response of the LN community has been revealing. At first, there were attempts to write the figure off as Bill Shelley. Then, PM became a 'stranger'. When these failed, there was relative silence, presumably in the expectation that the issue would fade away. Latterly we have seen a concerted effort to persuade us that PM is in fact a woman! I think we tend to forget that lone-nuttery is essentially a faith-based outlook. It also seems to be inextricably linked to political and historical attitudes in the States. Given the Vietnam War, Watergate, the Church Committeee and so forth and highly negative retrospective conclusions concerning the characters of key figures like Nixon, Johnson and Hoover, it is perhaps only to be expected that (mainly) conservatives will desperately try to retrieve something from the wreckage of that era. And if you can portray your (mainly left/liberal) adversaries as 'kooks', so much the better. There is such a level of emotional investment in the Kennedy assassination that it will be difficult to change minds. Noticeably, rather than showing interest in PM, even Warren critics have largely bodyswerved the issue. Yet, here is the ideal opportunity for a journalist to take up PM as the perfect illustration of people not being able to see the wood for the trees. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1403 |
I'm waiting to hear from anyone (Read other Forums) who wants to nominate who the female TSBD employee is standing where PM is. C'mon but you're so cock sure, so certain, so adamant. ...................is that fucking crickets chirping I hear....surely not. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1411 |
...................is that fucking crickets chirping I hear....surely not. It sure is, Mick. And they are getting louder by the minute. | |
| ||
Administrator Posts: 921 |
I've said it before and here I am saying it again. Brian Dead Man Doyle is a self-proclaimed genius. No matter what the topic. No matter what discipline. No matter how complicated the question. Once Albert Brian Doyle casts his beady eyes over something he can solve it within 10 minutes. Once his conclusion has been reached then his dead-brain farts turn into facts. He read one post by Lying Sack of Shit Duncan MacBumWhiff and *poof* Prayer Man is a woman. He can make out details in this photograph now that a dragonfly would struggle to see. Previously, this silly bastard claimed it was a just a pixelated mess that we were all looking at. Now he can see wrist joints, buttons and fucking eyelashes. The frame he is using, the frame that Lying Sack of Shit Duncan MuckyBum used that, given some of the clear frames we do have from Darnell and Weigman, is one that consists of motion blur. In other words, this is one of the worst frames available and the fucked-up anomolies they are imagining are hair, fingernails and skin-cells are just double exposures that cannot be replicated in any clear frame we have. Brian Doyle is a loud mouthed prick who wants the best evidence suppressed and the worst evidence promoted. He doesn't want to discuss the logistics of Baker and Truly's movements. They make it clear who Prayer Man is. Oh no. Shit-for-Brains Doyle would sooner harp on about a military cargo plane landing in the Trinity River basin and picking up one of the 60,000 Lee Harvey Oswald's that were wandering around Dallas. Fuck Albert Doyle - and fuck his son, Brian, too. | |
| ||
Administrator Posts: 729 |
Her name is Lee Harvey Oswald, Mick. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1143 |
That's a good one, Paul!! | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1403 |
Too funny mate. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1013 |
Will Stinky produce a book to highlight his stunning discovery? Will it be packed with supporting documents, news reports, affidavits..ect, which prove beyond a reasonable doubt, his theory is correct? Or is he only going to rely on bullshit and absolutely THE worst image available. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1915 |
He won't coz he can't | |
-- _________________________________________________________________________________ Prayer Man The Movie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0B8JhOe3KU Prayer Man website: http://www.prayer-man.com/ Prayer Man on Twitter: https://twitter.com/PMisLeeOswald
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1013 |
Barto, perhaps you could ask Brian if he is prepared to write a book or an essay detailing this remarkable development if Stinky is unable to. | |
| ||
Administrator Posts: 729 |
Stinky is an illiterate, steely. He's not real good at following picture books either. That's why he is in the bullshit industry. He can't do anything else. | |
| ||
Member Posts: 533 |
Tried some colorizing. Still looks very much like Oswald. | |
| ||
Administrator Posts: 729 |
It certainly does, Vinny. Its probably cause it is Oswald. The reason I got into PM was because he looked like Oswald. Sean then explained why it has to be Oswald. PM isn't a woman nor looks like one. If anyone thinks PM is a woman then they should fuck off and do something else. Leave PM to those who don't think its a woman. | |
| ||
Site Owner Posts: 2049 |
Message to Tommy Graves: You recently accused me of using faulty logic at the Ed Forum. You did so by misquoting me. In case you aren't aware, I cannot respond there any more. Here is what you said:
What I actually said was "Oswald was PM therefore PM was a man." - a position I arrived at via the same way you say you did - a process of elimination. I'm sure you didn't misquote deliberately, but can you please acknowledge the mistake at the place it was made? Thanks. | |
--I'm just one of the Dregs of Society from South Bunyip Valley Heights
http://gregparke4.wix.com/gregrparker Then the place was run by shucks and clowns Motherfuckers are still thick on the ground
| ||
Member Posts: 158 |
1. Someone here who have the skills to blur Lovelady in the Altgens photo in the same ways as in PM? My guess is that although they look similar there is still enough features to discern the difference. That is: Altgens = Lovelady, PM = Oswald. 2. There are extremely accurat face recognition software on the market: http://fortune.com/2015/06/23/facial-recognition-freak-out/ Is there anyone so far who have tried it on PM vs. possible candidates = most likely? | |
| ||
Site Owner Posts: 2049 |
G, I'll stand corrected on this, because it's only a vague memory of reading about it once before, but I think a sharper image is needed. But then, if we had a sharper image, we probably wouldn't need the software. The value of the software would be in matching an image to one in a database where the individual is unknown and no other clues exist to identify them. | |
--I'm just one of the Dregs of Society from South Bunyip Valley Heights
http://gregparke4.wix.com/gregrparker Then the place was run by shucks and clowns Motherfuckers are still thick on the ground
| ||
You must login to post.