Forums
Forum Home > JFK > Baker's run | ||
---|---|---|
Moderator Posts: 1411 |
Thanks for sharing that interesting story, Paul. We are definitely onto something. There's no doubt about that whatsoever. | |
| ||
Administrator Posts: 729 |
Jake, when I took a break I still kept up with the research. Well the interesting stuff anyways but it also occurred to me that you really don't have to know much about this case to perhaps one day get people to see that Oswald didn't in fact shoot JFK. A simple photo of him on the steps just after the shots proves that. All those alternative theories, all those 2 Oswalds, or those alterationists and all the pomposity of this debate can go in the trash can. PM is by far the most important breakthrough I've seen in this case. By a fucking country mile. You find out who PM is and as Terry's wife said its game over. | |
| ||
Administrator Posts: 729 |
Gday Terry. Thanks mate. Your wife and my son are probably wondering what the fuss is with our fascination in this case. Its pretty clear they think its all a bit too much. If they only knew that PM is still not enough for some they wouldn't believe us. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1143 |
Yes, Paul, she certainly doesn't believe it and wonders why there are so many people yapping at the forums about nothing. She's really tolerant of me and my faults but that's about as far as her tolerance goes. She thinks... well, it wasn't too lady-like so I won't repeat it. She told me to just publish the picture of Oswald and quite "wasting so much time on those forums". Ya gotta love her! | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1013 |
One hour...just one hour of honest, impartial debate on live TV and this case is reopened. That's how close we are. The Horseshit and Lies (nice one Ed!) groupies are acting like a parachute. Fuck 'em. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 402 |
Paul, Once a poster on another forum asked me if I understood what Oswald as PM meant in terms of all the testimony from all the people in the TSBD that would have to be lying. I wanted to say "Who the fuck cares?" That's the beauty of it. It's a picture from the moment JFK was shot! I don't care what it does to everyone else in the world. What about knowing what fucking happened? If it's a picture of Oswald, then DEAL with it! It's so incredle the egotists who won't give this a second glance simply because they weren't the ones who figured it out. Oswald comes back from the grave in prayer to wreak havoc on all concerned. Oh, the irony of it. Credits to Sean and all the rest, including the people here. This case isn't cracked, it's ruptured. A lawyer needs to take it up and get the original films ordered for examination to make this final. It will make the lawyer who does it famous. Any takers out there? | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1403 |
Welcome "home" Paul. It's great to see you back here mate. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1403 |
Steely, you are bang on!!!! It'll come, as Stan has mentioned we just need that 10% more clarity, and its all over. The rest will follow to be sure. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1239 | ||
| ||
Administrator Posts: 729 |
Thanks Mick. Your fantastic thread on Frazier has impacted the way I think about him. He is a key figure in breaking this case wide open. | |
| ||
Administrator Posts: 729 |
A lawyer ain't gonna do anything serious unless they get paid, Jake. Fuck em. I hate famous lawyers. They grow up to be LN's if the money is right. This needs a concerted group effort. The law can do what the fuck it wants with the case after its exposed. I will retire from this case once and for all after PM is revealed right after I return from Stinky's after I've told them LN's to kiss my arse. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1403 |
Stan, I think what you've done here at this forum is unbelievable, your work has in a very physical and visual way helped us all to see Pm a whole lot more clearly than ever before. Onward we march mate, and who knows what happens next | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 402 |
Stan.....what Mick just said. Great stuff. Great choice also because along with everything else it shows the unique 'right shoulder low' posture that can be seen even in blurry pictures. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 402 |
Paul, This is going to be such a colassal humiliation for so many, it's hard to imagine. One good graphic (actually one more great graphic) from Stan and ten minutes of fame for somebody who looks good on TV (who here?) and it's time to play CYA, or in Stinky's case, KYA (as in kiss it). | |
| ||
Member Posts: 48 |
This is probably old news? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnhKsIVCd00 Stabilised Baker run plus zoom of PM appearing to be manipulating something. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1915 |
Nice one John, one I did not have this one in da collection yet. | |
-- _________________________________________________________________________________ Prayer Man The Movie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0B8JhOe3KU Prayer Man website: http://www.prayer-man.com/ Prayer Man on Twitter: https://twitter.com/PMisLeeOswald
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1013 |
The zoom is interesting. I can't decide how much hand movement there actually is, or whether the movement is down to the ripple effect in the clip that Ed noted. | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 1239 |
To follow-up on Jake's comment, the posture is about the same. And the shirt seems to match. Let's not Tidd around. This is Oswald!
Why people are not doing backflips over this is astounding. But then, not everyone is a ROKCer.
Isn't that right, Vacant lot? Isn't that right, Lord Mingus? Lady Di? Brian Doyle? Very Busy Life Support System for an Emotional Center? Herr Burnham?
You get the picture. They don't.
| |
| ||
Member Posts: 330 |
These are great John - so clear. Surely PM hand's are moving - looks like a rapid twirling movement to me. Winding a camera or putting the lid back on his coke bottle?? Just to speculate for a moment. Oswald goes to the TSBD steps to have his pathetic last lunch as a free man (cheese sandwich, apple and coke) with a camera slung around his neck to take a photo of JFK. Puts the lunch bag and coke down to take his photo and wind the camera afterwards. In the confusion after the shots he forgets to take his discarded lunch with him. That's why it's left on the steps to be photographed shortly after. I know I'm trying to have it both ways here. But otherwise why would he leave the lunch on the steps? | |
| ||
Member Posts: 330 |
PS meant to add - why would he put the lunch down unless he had something else to do with his hands? | |
| ||
You must login to post.