Forums
Forum Home > JFK > Did Frazier Indirectly Identify Prayer Man | ||
---|---|---|
Member Posts: 533 |
Albert Rossi on Tue 30 Sep 2014, 7:08 pm Hi all. I was at the AARC. I figured I might as well try it again, so I approached Buell with the Robin Unger enhancement of the Darnell frame on my laptop desktop, and asked him
1. if that was him 2. who the other figure was.
He admitted 1. was him. He said 2. was not clear enough for certain identification, but it probably wasn't Lovelady because by that time he had taken off with Shelley for the RR yard. Note he says it probably wasn't Lovelady. Why mention Lovelady? Lovelady was a guy who resembled Oswald to some extent.Perhaps what he was hinting something like this. The guy is not Lovelady,but the guy who resembled Lovelady, a guy named Lee Oswald. Otherwise why did he suddenly mention Lovelady when shown the PM image? | |
| ||
Moderator Posts: 402 |
It's true that little exchange with Rossi is loaded once you attempt to get inside Mr. Frazier's mind like that. It's a very nuanced little set of statements. I think he knows what he's doing and how to phrase things and do agree that there is allusion to Oswald by the reference to Lovelady. Also note he says Shelley and Lovelady were off to the tracks by then. That is immediately after the shooting, not several minutes later and so no Lovelady and Shelley together loitering out by the "island" and talking to Calvery, as Shelley testified at WC (but as Lovelady did not). | |
| ||
Member Posts: 533 |
| |
| ||
Member Posts: 533 |
| |
| ||
Member Posts: 533 |
Thanks Jake. Speaking of Frazier he will be releasing a book in the near future.I wonder if he will ever mention the Prayer Man issue. | |
-- Out with Bill Shelley in front.
| ||
Moderator Posts: 402 |
I doubt it Vinny. It does not fit the spin cycle. There's a reason he won't address it directly and it's probably a very good reason. I'll buy his book. He's gone through a lot. The irony is that very moment in time is what is giving him something worth writing about. If he weren't on those steps at that time, he probably wouldn't have a book. Yet he can't address that figure standing right next to him who's voice is louder than all others by virtue of the anonymity of PM/Oswald. His not mentioning PM simply reinforces PM's presence. A negative template pushed further to the positive. There is no escaping it, as hard as they try; and they really do try. | |
| ||
You must login to post.