REOPEN KENNEDY CASE

Has anyone here read this?

http://www.amazon.com/General-Walker-Murder-President-Kennedy/dp/0991563700/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1449330086&sr=1-1

Well, I went through almost all of it. There are still few chapters left - it almost a 1000 tome, and one needs to focus to be able to follow all the threds and connections. This book provides enough data to consider seriously the possibility that the ultra-right radicals pulled the ropes in the assassination of JFK. However, the case evolves by presenting the context, there is no cocrete evidence that General Walker was the one behind the assassination. In contrast, Milteer's involvement is well documented. A good chapter, in my view, was Chapter 21 about Clinton-Jackson trip, This chapter provides a logical explanation of this trip - Oswald, under the guidance of Banister and Ferrie was trying to penetrate CORE (a he did with the Fair Play Commitee for Cuba or the students' organizations). If he penetrated those organisations, the rightest would then try to destroy these orgainisations by pointing to the involvement of the communists, which in that period would be a blow. There was a law in making according to which communists might spend years in jail (this law was never instigated), therefore it was necessary to infect the alleged left wing organisations with provocateurs - Oswald played this role. In contrast, the chapter 16 about the assassination builds largely on the Warren Commission evidence, to which Author's view was added according to which Oswald was repeating in JFK assassination his role in Walker's incident. This role was that Oswald would temporarily play a role of a potential assassin, a left winger, who would have to be then exonerated as the lack of evidence has been inplanted to his role. However, Oswald was tricked, his role as a would be assassin changed to the role of a future convicted assassin.

I would certainly encourage reading this book, it is a remarkable book. This is not a review, I just jotted down some impressions from reading some 80-90% of the book.The author relies on his access to Garrison's library which he studies for many years. Dr. Caufield also followed many leads and did his own interviews with some witnesses.

Ok, I'll buy it, thank you for a good summary. I trust the people here.